Re: [E-devel] EDC Reference

[Vincent T. <vt...@un...>]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, dan sinclair wrote:

> Did you remove collections.group.parts.part.description.color_class,
> color, color2, color3 on purpose? If so, what's the reasoning behind
> this? (lines 139-142 and 1620 - 1694)

If I'm not mistaken, they are moved (lines 128 and 1209)

maybe the patch should be in 2 parts, code + doc.

Vincent

> On 13-Nov-07, at 1:08 AM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:32:35 -0300 andres <and...@gm...>
>>> babbled:
>>>
>>>
>>>> As some of you might know I'm writting a EDC reference as Doxygen
>>>> formmated
>>>> comments directly into edje_cc_handlers.c
>>>>
>>>> My theory is that having the reference flowing along the code will
>>>> ease
>>>> mantienance of the reference as the Edje specifications change.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the current state, http://pastebin.com/m49666ef9
>>>>
>>>> It's mostly text I already wrote on the wiki but what I want to
>>>> know is if
>>>> the reference is going to be included before putting even more
>>>> hours into it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> wow. thats a lot of.... patches/code/comments. thats a good idea.
>>> it means we
>>> can keep it consistent alongside the code. what do others think?
>>>
>>
>> Very nice... massive patch.  Very nicely done.
>>
>> benr.
>>