From: David S. <on...@gm...> - 2006-01-26 22:37:44
|
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:08:02 -0800 Ben Rockwood <be...@cu...> wrote: > Michael Jennings wrote: >=20 > >On Thursday, 26 January 2006, at 15:45:26 (-0600), > >Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > > > > =20 > > > >>He may be referring to the speed of updates and publishing, not > >>loading pages from SF. > >> =20 > >> > > > >Waiting 5 or 10 minutes for software to compile so you can debug one > >little change is a royal pain in the ass. Waiting 5 or 10 minutes > >for a web page to update is nothing. > > =20 > > > Thats the stupidest thing I've ever heard you say. And here I was thinking it was the sanest thing I've ever heard him say. I've never seen XMS take anywhere near that long to edit and publish a page BTW. It doesn't seem to be any faster or slower than any other method of editing and publishing web pages. Then there is the problems involved in changing over to a new CMS. enlightenment.org and get-e.org are already using XMS, and edevelop.org is already using Drupal. Those are the three official E web ring sites. I see no reason to change the software that runs any of them, and changing the software used will be a royal pain getting all the content transferred. |