Re: [E-devel] Smart objects

[Stephen H. <Pro...@gm...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This one time, at band camp, Jose O Gonzalez wrote:
> From: Jose O Gonzalez <jos...@ju...>
> To: enl...@li...
> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 03:52:27 -0400
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Smart objects
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:23:18 -0700 Stephen writes:
> > This one time, at band camp, Jose O Gonzalez wrote:
> > > From: Jose O Gonzalez <jos...@ju...>
> > > To: enl...@li...
> > > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:00:38 -0400
> > > Subject: [E-devel] Smart objects
> > >=20
> > > .....
> > > .....
> > > .....
> > >=20
> > > 	This is clearly not a well defined state of affairs --
> > > either smart objects "own" their children, and/or the layer does.
> > > 	If both (so that smart objects are like disconnected
> > > blobs), then what is a clear, consistent semantics for stacking
> > > order, event handling, and associated api functions?
> > >=20
> > > 	Smart objects are just too wild..  :)
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > 	Jose.
> >=20
> > I cannot believe no one has responded to this. I am not going to=20
> > pretend to have
> > an interesting response to this, but I can say that I did read your=20
> > whole post
> > and you did have some interesting things to say. Perhaps you should=20
> > stop by
> > #edevelop and discuss things with raster. At anyrate good stuff.
> >=20
> > Stephen
> >=20
>=20
> 	Carsten and I do keep in touch -- thru a secret carrier-pidgeon
> network :)
> 	It's just that lately he's been hit over the head with a deluge
> of heavyweight mail.. a lot of it from me :)
>=20
> 	One reason I wrote this is to bring the issue up and see if
> those who are currently using evas, and deal with these aspects,
> have any problems with the current semantics of the stackin order
> and event handling fuctions.. or not.
> 	Because one of the consequences of changing things as I'm
> pointing too, could be to screw up a lot of current stuff.. :(
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practic=
es
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> --=20
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Yes I cleary understand what you mean now that I've read MoOm's replies as =
well
as his code. As for what other people are doing to handle this stacking ord=
er
issue I'm not sure, and personally It's never come up with the few snippets=
 of
code i've wrote that use evas. At anyrate I'm sure like  you said, that Car=
sten
has read the emails and of course knows his own code, and has plains to add=
ress
this very thing. YaY Raster! Thanks for the free software ^_^

Stephen

- --=20
- ------------- Ap=C3=B3 Mechan=C3=ADs The=C3=B3s --------------
     The Voidengineer (Stephen Horner) =E6=82=9F
	   protocol.x at gmail.com
             PGP 0xCDC2DD2B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDCTNbRRkTWiD8QjIRAotPAJ9ISpN5Ielkzf7HR21NYhKfA+G++QCfXD7d
G47GufHrJanIu2nzG3cAbTQ=3D
=3DwDax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----