From: Carsten H. (T. R. <ra...@ra...> - 2005-08-23 07:55:59
|
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:51:26 +0200 Martin Zwickel <mar...@te...> babbled: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:30:28 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ra...@ra...> bubbled: > > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:53:07 +0200 ilLogict <ill...@on...> > > babbled: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I always had the same problem on my box. But on amd64, this is set > > > as gcc's default. Do anyone know how to bypass it so that it won't > > > be used? > > > > man gcc. as for the sse fp math... it (from memory) makes gcc use the > > sse instruction set to do floating point math operations. this is > > likely a bad thing as it 1. means using the "mmx unit" and swapping > > out of fp mode and thus you have a cycle hit with an emms coming back > > in - as the fp ops are short and not all over this isn't much worth > > it. i suspect there is some conversion rounding cumulative error. but > > as i dont have an amd64 i cant tell you much more than what i suspect. > > :) > > Maybe you can disable the option in the specs file?! that is not our job - to dictate build flag policy. that's the job of the builder. :) we provide a SAMPLe .spec file for building rpm's - it's nto a final thing. it's intended to help packagers build off. > -- > MyExcuse: > incompatible bit-registration operators > > Martin Zwickel <mar...@te...> > Research & Development > > TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de> > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... 裸好多 ra...@de... Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) |