Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: libs/evas smugg

[Till A. <ti...@ad...>]

# Quoting Christian Kreibich (kre...@in...):

> So, did you intend HEAD to be left alone completely, for all modules,
> until things stabilized on SPLIT and then merge the whole repository
> back into HEAD? I don't think it really matters, it's just important
> that everybody understands it.

Yes, the intention was to leave HEAD alone as much as possible and
continue development on SPLIT until essence and e itself are in at least
a condition where they compile and maybe run for a few minutes without
sefaulting. This is so people have a 'working' (yeah, right) e17 in cvs
and we can merrily go ahead and break stuff in SPLIT. This minimizes the
amount of questions we get as to what's this, why doesnt it compile,
where is the iconbar, etc. ;)

I tagged all of e17 and not just apps/e because I think it is just
easier and enables us to try the new etox (due for commit to SPLIT any
day now ;) as well as the new ewl. We can also break a lib for a few
days without people jumping in our faces and screaming. If we change
something in e or essence, that requires changed to ebits, and/or etcher
for example, we are in trouble keeping stuff in sync if we only branch e
itself.

But as Michael said, obviously Boris is to blame, as always. ;)

Till