From: Didier C. <did...@sp...> - 2004-09-29 02:11:35
|
On 11/09/04, at 12:49 +0200, Kim Woelders <ki...@wo...> wrote: > Didier Casse wrote: > > On 08/09/04, at 20:40 -0400, Geoffrey <eso...@3t...> wrote: > > > > > >>Kim Woelders wrote: > >> > >>>Geoffrey wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Seems that the slide methods for windows does not function at all for > >>>>me. I've tried them all and see no effect. Is this a known problem, > >>>>or am I possibly missing something? > >>>> > >>>>Previously I have had success with box as well as a semi transparent > >>>>slide setting. I don't recall now, but I guess the semi-transparent > >>>>would be technical? > >>>> > >>> > >>>It actually all works, except that the window sliding code wasn't > >>>written to handle the CPU/graphics speed of computers today. The result > >>>is that a minimum per iteration slide distance kicks in which makes the > >>>slide time so short that you don't really see the effect. > >> > >>Ah, I see, or I don't see. :) Thanks for the update. Any plans to > >>address this? > > > > > > Yeah it's kind of a nice effect which was still present in > > enlightenment-0.16.6. Is there any way to see this stuff?:-( > > > The various sliding effects should be fixed in CVS now. > I'd appreciate feedback on whether or not it works now. i pulled out e16 from cvs compiled... and it still doesn't work on my system. :-( With kind regards, Didier. --- Didier F.B Casse | PhD student | Singapore Synchrotron light Source (SSLS) Email: didierbe AT sps dot nus dot sg | Web: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg GPG Key 1024D/B3C57D01 2004-06-23 |