#32 Nuke blast radius misleading for airburst

[Markus Armbruster]

Nuclear devices are described by damage and blast
radius. I'd expect readers of `info Damage' to expect
them to do at least some damage to all sectors within
the blast radius. This is generally not the case for
airburst. Damage drops to zero long at a distance much
smaller than the advertised blast radius.

For example, 10kt fission has blast radius 3, which
yields airburst blast radius 4, according to `info
Damage'. The true blast radius is 2.

I suggest to fix `info Damage'.