|
From: Bertho S. <lc...@va...> - 2026-10-23 14:55:02
|
On 10/23/26 4:10 PM, Robert Schöftner wrote: > I think discourse deployment is recommended via the docker image. > Maintenance should be limited to keeping the docker image up to date and > happy. Though I don't really like the "hiding" of all the stuff, docker > just really is a fancy chroot, and IME it works fine and takes the > hassle out of keeping up to date with dependencies and security updates. That would put you in the situation that you download a docker image, which you have no control over how it was built. Otherwise, you need to rebuild it for every change and are again in the same position I described before. It is essentially a >borked< if you do and >borked< if you don't situation. What can be created from the Debian repositories (or other distros)? That has generally a long life and a well-defined update/upgrade path. It is better to reduce bells and whistles for stability as well as easy and ordered system administration. > discourse itself is GPL2 > https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/main/LICENSE.txt Yes, it is FOSS. But, its not about the license as such. Its about the deployment and the effort it takes to keep it running and up-to-date without any data loss, doing so with the available resources. -- Greetings Bertho (disclaimers are disclaimed) |