Re: [Emc-developers] on the integer question by Rene

[<mar...@he...>]

To me it seems unwise to remove the integer types. Both signed and
unsigned are usefull. The unsigned type is especially usefull for
encoders, since it will properly overflow/underflow. For the signed type
overflow/underflow is implementation defined.

Since C++20 the conversion from unsigned to signed is also well defined,
and is supposed to do what everybody already expected.

Titus Newswanger <nw...@ma...> wrote:

	On 6/8/26 3:39 AM, Luca Toniolo wrote:
	> Trim to three, bool, real, int, where int absorbs s32/u32/s64/u64 and 
	> carries bit patterns,
	
	I don't understand well enough how replacing s32/u32/s64/u64 with int 
	would work, to outright agree or disagree with that. We'd basically have 
	one int type s64 called int ? Now I can see doing that...