|
From: Dave C. <lin...@gm...> - 2021-07-12 20:24:56
|
Could someone please point out why this COC is even an issue? If we already agreed to some terms, why is a COC being layered on top of that? Seeing people pack their bags over a proposal, seems like a bad idea. The argument that no professional organizations or people will be attracted to a project without a COC is nonsense. History tells a much different story. How many commercial products have grabbed LCNC code ?? Quite a few! I do not understand why anyone spent time writing a COC ?? This list has been quite civilized for a very long time. Dave On 7/12/2021 1:15 PM, Les Newell wrote: > You do know you agreed to a much more restrictive CoC when you joined > this mailing list, don't you? Here is the full agreement: > <https://slashdotmedia.com/terms-of-use> > This is linked from the EMC-users subscription form > <https://sourceforge.net/projects/emc/lists/emc-users> > > If you agreed to that, why are you so stressed about the one Jeff > proposed? If you don't agree you'd best unsubscribe quickly before it > upsets you. > > Les > > On 12/07/2021 09:03, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: >> >> You don't realise that forcing CoC on others is exactly what's the >> problem with CoC. Just drop that f****ing CoC nonsens and everythings >> going to be civilized again. But I see, this won't happen. That's the >> whole point of forcing CoC: faschism. >> >> Nik >> > |