From: Robert E. <rw...@gm...> - 2013-09-28 23:01:18
|
Hi Andy, I agree, a finite jerk profile would be a nice feature. That would be a good 2nd pass to take after lookahead is working. At that point, the machine will be able to pass quickly through small segments, which means hitting a lot of blends in a short time. Right now, the blends are not acceleration-continuous, so that could cause trouble at high speeds. I'll look into it a little more and see how challenging it would be to do S-curves instead of trapezoids. Best, -Rob On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 6:34 PM, andy pugh <bod...@gm...> wrote: > On 28 September 2013 23:20, Robert Ellenberg <rw...@gm...> wrote: > > Thanks for the link to the documentation! I do plan to code this myself, > > though I would welcome any input from other developers. > > I don't think many of us really understand that part of the code. But > I think you can rely on our goodwill. > > Not wanting to make a hard job even harder, but if you could work-in > finite jerk into the equations too, then that would address another > moderately common request. > > -- > atp > If you can't fix it, you don't own it. > http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most > from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > |