Re: [Emc-developers] latency results table on wiki

[Anders W. <and...@gm...>]

How difficult would it be to automatically gather information about the
system (rt-patch, versions, etc.) along with the jitter values and format
them into a standard message (email, whatever).
The website could then have a database which is auto-updated whenever it
receives a correctly formatted email?

for preempt-rt, there are already large databases out there. Does anyone
know how well the linuxcnc latency-test correlates with the standard
preempt-rt values quoted?
https://www.osadl.org/Latency-plots.latency-plots.0.html


Anders

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Chris Morley <chr...@ho...>wrote:

> I am thinking we are going to need to add a column for
> type of realtime patch with UB coming along soon.
>
> I am also thinking that the two columns showing max interval are less
> useful.
> removing them would give more room for other text and also help people
> to concentrate on what is important - jitter.
>
> Even at that, servo jitter is less useful as everywhere we always quote
> base jitter.
> We should probably address that somehow in the manual...
>
> I will change the wiki, removing the max interval and adding realtime
> patch.
> Anyone think this is the wrong thing to do?
>
>
> Chris M
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>