Re: [Emc-developers] Rockhopper revisited

[Matt S. <ma...@ma...>]

On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:49:19 -0400
Gene Heskett <ghe...@wd...> wrote:

> That would be something that I had cobbled up, but then bypassed,
> with the net input probably still hooked up, so 2 or 3 modules are
> there, and are being fed data, but the output isn't being used
> anymore.  That sort of stuff could be excised, saving a few cycles in
> the servo-thread I'd think. But I tend to leave it laying there just
> in case I need to 'hook' it up again for something else.  I'm as
> packrat that way. 

Commenting out the addf statements for the functions associated with
the unused components will eliminate their time consumption in your
servo-thread.

Thanks,
Matt