Re: [Emc-users] problem with genserkins

[charles g. <xxz...@ya...>]

are there any quite simple objective premises that form a basis for evaluating statements?

--- On Wed, 11/9/11, andy pugh <bod...@gm...> wrote:


From: andy pugh <bod...@gm...>
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] problem with genserkins
To: "Francesca Sca" <fan...@ya...>, "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc...@li...>
Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2011, 3:00 AM


On 9 November 2011 09:44, Francesca Sca <fan...@ya...> wrote:

> I don't find the parameter genserkin.max-iterations in Hal Config.

It should be under "parameters" is that where you looked?

> If I put this line "setp ganserkin.max-iterations 100" in hal file, Emc2 gives an error because It isn't found this pin.

I am assuming you spelt it correctly? It has to be exactly
"genserkins.max-iterations"
I don't know for a fact that the pin is created, but the code to
create it is in the kinematics file.

-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users