From: Kirk W. <kwa...@wa...> - 2011-10-31 16:44:05
|
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 13:34 +0000, andy pugh wrote: > On 31 October 2011 13:19, <kqt...@co...> wrote: > > > One really irritating point is if I leave EMC up over night > > Some times I want to pause a long running job and continue the next > day. If I leave EMC up over night the next day it has the "Unexpected > realtime error" so I have to shut down EMC and reinitialize just to be > safe This is a good argument for fitting home sensors and/or a probe. > > That is possibly over-cautious. I have a machine that requires the SMI > patch, but I also regularly run compiles on it too, and every time I > do that it wipes out the changes to rtapi.conf (One day I will change > the .in file and get rid of this problem). This means that quite often > I run parts with the SMI patch missing, and with very high latency > spikes (600,000) every 64 seconds. So far I have not actually seen any > problems (though I am using a 7i43.) manifested in the parts. But none > of my parts are all that important. My recent latency problem occurs at a high rate so appears immediately after pressing reset on the latency test. I suspect this might indicate where the problem might come from, but I haven't looked into it yet. I really don't see a lack of PCI slots. Newegg or other dealers have plenty of ATX or micro-ATX boards. Single board computers and backplanes come up on eBay fairly often. The bigger problem is finding a motherboard that will work with the current software. That's why it's important for all of us to post our latency and hardware results to the latency page to reduce the buy and try problem. What would really be nice is to have an open hardware project for an EMC2 optimized motherboard. -- Kirk Wallace http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/ http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html California, USA |