From: Jon E. <el...@pi...> - 2010-10-30 16:15:41
|
Chris Radek wrote: > However I think you might find it faster by staring at the code > you've added. Look closely wherever you dereference a pointer to > make sure that the pointer points where you think. Remember that > array[...] is also a pointer dereference. > I commented out all changed sections, and then put them back in one at a time. I finally figured out I had a mistake in the nesting of curly braces, and had a section with an array outside the loop, so it got an n+1 array subscript, which was probably the cause. Still working on it, but at least making some progress! Thanks, Jon |