From: Jon E. <el...@pi...> - 2010-08-06 05:05:18
|
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > > The shield is only required for USB2 cables. In the interest of saving > a milli-cent, it's probably left out on anything that it isn't needed > for, such as a very low speed game controller (which probably doesn't > even need USB 1.1 speed, let alone USB2). > Hmmm, I guess if you don't care if the FCC has your head on a platter (which the Chinese knockoff artists wouldn't care) then you can do that. Since the cable COULD be plugged into a USB2 port, and the drivers will have the super-fast edge rates even when sending at 1.5 KBits/second (low speed), I think it would still be a powerful radiator, and flunk even class A tests. At "full speed" 12 Kbits/second, it is just illegal, as the limit is no clock whatsoever can be above 9 KHz. I have no idea what sort of schlock the Chinese are pumping out, I can only imagine some of the consumer-grade stuff at Micro-Center is so awful it will barely work in the best environment. Losing control of a CNC system is potentially dangerous, so I'd just avoid anything that has any potential for connection problems. Jon |