From: Jeff E. <je...@un...> - 2009-12-28 00:10:13
|
I don't personally want or need this, but if the feature works right I don't have an objection. I noticed a few things about the proposed patch: + CHKS((!_readers['x'] || !_readers['y']), _("Cannot read polar coordinate on a machine lacking X or Y axes")); one natural thing to do might be to extend this to all the different planes. If not adding this right away, maybe the @< notation should be rejected for now when not in G17 so that it never changes the meaning of a future program. I also missed the code which makes code like @2.5<140 X0 Y0 an error; this is nonsense code, right? Jeff |