From: Jeff E. <je...@un...> - 2009-06-24 14:20:41
|
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 07:08:48AM -0600, John Thornton wrote: > I like the branch idea, unless the change can be tested. > > If you created a 2.3 9.04 branch does it get updated automagiclly with > other 2.3 changes or would someone have to monitor that? I'm not > exactly sure how everything works in git but I like it. Whoever is taking care of this branch would have to actively choose changes from trunk (probably using cherry-pick) and incorporate bugfixes from v2_3_branch (probably using merge). Creating the branch: $ git branch --no-track v2_3_ports_branch origin/v2_3_branch $ git checkout v2_3_ports_branch Switched to branch "v2_3_ports_branch" Merging changes from v2_3_branch: $ git merge v2_3_branch Updating db12e77..e3f44a2 Fast forward src/emc/usr_intf/axis/scripts/axis.py | 116 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) Cherry-picking a change: $ git cherry-pick eeb716 Finished one cherry-pick. [v2_3_ports_branch 071095b] Directly use X font metrics because Tk8.5 "font measure" doesn't 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) I don't (yet, anyway) have a 9.04 system so I'm looking to somebody else to actually maintain this proposed branch. Jeff |