RE: [Embedlets-developer] Re: PLC help

[James C. <ca...@vi...>]

Ted,

> I find it very interesting that you are discussing the project with
members of the PIC list

Must admit though.. I can feel alot of 'blank faces' on the other sides of
the screen. Its going to take a while to get the message accross one feels.

> like the JavaBeans-to-ActiveX bridge
>
> (http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/software/bridge/)
>
> might allow him work with Embedlets?

Yes, I am keen to just keep in mind the dark-side-of-the-force and make sure
if it is easy to do so, ensure Embedlets work in that framework also or at
least have some bridging or Adaptlet technique to make it work.

>wide-fan-out document that was created

Distributed wireless companies have been showing a bit of interest in muvium
so I am experimenting with ways to talk about this to get the message
accross. The 'pitch' if you like. I think the wide-fan-out document is the
best 'visual summary' we have so far of the Systems objectives, ie without
really even getting into the nitty gritty of the containers etc. Its like
the 'Big Picture' for that type of app. I certainly like the idea of
developing the Embedlets website with materials like this to help commercial
interests understand the opportunities that come from the Embedlets
specification.

James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: emb...@li...
> [mailto:emb...@li...]On Behalf Of Ted
> Kosan
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:06 PM
> To: emb...@li...
> Subject: [Embedlets-developer] Re: PLC help
>
>
> James,
>
> Another way to market the Embedlet Container idea might be to say
> that it is a
> Virtual Embedded System that can easily be interfaced to a wide number of
> existing systems and can be placed into a wide range of platforms
> (from very
> small PICs up through larger embedded controllers, PCs and even servers).
>
> I find it very interesting that you are discussing the project
> with members of
> the PIC list and it is probably very telling that this specific
> person wanted
> to know if the technology was going to be compatible with VB.net
> right from the
> start.
>
> And you know, he had an interesting idea.  I guess as long as the
> PC he was
> running on had a current version of the JRE (or maybe JDK) on it,
> something
> like the JavaBeans-to-ActiveX bridge
>
> (http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/software/bridge/)
>
> might allow him work with Embedlets?
>
>
> I also noticed you used the original wide-fan-out document that
> was created
> early on.  I suppose that as soon as our strategy firms up over
> the next couple
> of weeks that I should start building the Embedlets website up a
> bit so we can
> direct people there if they want to learn more about what we are doing.
>
>
> Ted
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Embedlets-developer mailing list
> Emb...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer
>
>