Re: [Embedlets-developer] Re: Visual Age....
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
tkosan
|
From: Brill P. <bri...@ro...> - 2003-01-28 04:30:46
|
Hey James... when I reply to you, I get the list address in the To: field... how did you manage that? I'm wondering if I can get Outlook Express to do that ;) - Brill Pappin Rogue Robotics www.roguerobotics.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Caska" <ca...@vi...> To: <emb...@li...> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:28 PM Subject: RE: [Embedlets-developer] Re: Visual Age.... > >Umm... what do you use by the way? > > I sleep with the enemy - J++ with Visual Interdev. Seriously I love being > able to integrate Java with VB/C++ app's via COM. Microsoft's J++ technology > is actually pretty darn impressive - in fact it was the nuturing ground for > their entire .NET platform IMO. > > JC > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: emb...@li... > > [mailto:emb...@li...]On Behalf Of > > Brill Pappin > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:02 PM > > To: emb...@li... > > Subject: Re: [Embedlets-developer] Re: Visual Age.... > > > > > > > > > > First time I tried this I was sold. I haven't found another IDE that > > comes > > > > even close. I think having something like this around would greatly > > > > enhance acceptance of embedlets. > > > > > > You ever had to maintain the underlying code that is generated by such > > tools. > > > It's ugly and typically unmaintainable.....but in the real world you > > always have > > > to dig into the code (every reasonably complex project I have ever seen > > > has).....so the costs soon outweight the benefits. > > > > That was one of my main problems with it as well, the code it > > generated was > > all over the place, and it was difficult get into the code once VAJ had > > created it. Frankly, I loved it when I first tried it... and it did have > > some "cool" features, but in the end I found I had to switch > > back. One thing > > I did like though, was how it managed *every* class and > > interface... and it > > forced you to view and think of the classes in an "OO way", which is why I > > still think it has value and I use it for teaching when I have to do that > > sort of work. Nothing forces a student to really *get it* than > > working in an > > environment that makes you think and work in OO and in java in particular. > > > > > > The demo is 'old' as IBM is moving to eclipse and support for > > Visual Age > > > > will stop in the (near) future. > > > > > > And so why are you recommending VAJ when it is already obsolete? Guess > > > the GUI builder just wasn't that useful in the real world after all. ;-) > > > > Eclipse is the "new" VAJ. I am happy to say that I am far more impressed > > with Eclipse... not only have the removed a lot of the garbage, but your > > source tree/project structure is intact (you can even change its location, > > though not easily), you so can plug it into an existing > > project... even use > > CVS. > > > > It's good enough that I might even use it (VAJ fans can even make it look > > like VAJ)... only trouble is that its editor is not great (the text entry > > part is not "smart enough") and its missing a lot of the tools and UI > > enhancements that JEdit plugins provide. Its also designed for Java > > specifically, where JEdit allows me to work with anything (can > > you tell I'm > > a JEdit fan?). It also seems to have a very slightly funky > > environment that > > causes normal ant builds to fail (you can execute Ant targets in > > Eclipse) so > > you have to be careful how you set up Ant. > > > > I was also a little concerned about its strong tie to IBM (being an IBM > > product)... not that I mind that much, but it was a little > > disappointing and > > it worried me a little that IBM could start charging for it or do > > just about > > anything else to it, at any time. > > > > Anyway. You use what you use, I'll use JEdit, and other folks can use > > Eclipse. Umm... what do you use by the way? > > > > - Brill Pappin > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Embedlets-developer mailing list > > Emb...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Embedlets-developer mailing list > Emb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer > |