Re: [Embedlets-developer] Re: Visual Age....
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
tkosan
|
From: Brill P. <bri...@ro...> - 2003-01-28 04:20:29
|
<laugh> I though he was being facetious... hay, wait... you both are! - Brill Pappin Rogue Robotics www.roguerobotics.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Caska" <ca...@vi...> To: <emb...@li...> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:26 PM Subject: RE: [Embedlets-developer] Re: Visual Age.... > >500M lines of quality 2EE code in 3.5 man years of development in 9 months > elapsed.... > > 500,000,000 / (365 * 3.5) = 391,542 lines per day > > 391,542 lines per day * ~10 characters per line = 3,915,420 key bangs per > day > > 3,915,420 key bangs per day / (86400 secs/day) = 45 keys stokes per second! > > Man... you really are a coding god! :-) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: emb...@li... > > [mailto:emb...@li...]On Behalf Of > > Andrzej Jan Taramina > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:34 AM > > To: emb...@li... > > Subject: [Embedlets-developer] Re: Visual Age.... > > > > > > Jac said: > > > > > Has anyone (apart from me) ever worked with IBMs VisualAge for Java? > > > (Restricted version is available for download at IBM website) One of the > > > great features of it was the ability to visualy design a swing (or awt) > > > user interface and visualy wire the events generated by one swing > > > component to another one, or even better to wire events from beans to > > > beans. > > > > People either love or hate VAJ. I happen to hate it and don't > > believe in IDE's > > that try to be too smart (don't get me started on that > > topic...500M lines of > > quality 2EE code in 3.5 man years of development in 9 months > > elapsed....and I > > doubt we could have done it with an IDE). I did a little code > > speed test once > > many years ago during an EJB course (before J2EE was even coined)....me > > with my editor/debugger...everyone else with VAJ. I wrote > > approximately 10x > > more code in the same period. VAJ doesn't even let you see the > > whole source > > for a class. Then again, if you have a VAJ itch, I believe your > > pharmicist can > > perscribe some creams to fix that. <grins> > > > > > First time I tried this I was sold. I haven't found another IDE > > that comes > > > even close. I think having something like this around would greatly > > > enhance acceptance of embedlets. > > > > You ever had to maintain the underlying code that is generated by > > such tools. > > It's ugly and typically unmaintainable.....but in the real world > > you always have > > to dig into the code (every reasonably complex project I have ever seen > > has).....so the costs soon outweight the benefits. > > > > > The demo is 'old' as IBM is moving to eclipse and support for Visual Age > > > will stop in the (near) future. > > > > And so why are you recommending VAJ when it is already obsolete? Guess > > the GUI builder just wasn't that useful in the real world after all. ;-) > > > > Andrzej Jan Taramina > > Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions > > http://www.chaeron.com > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Embedlets-developer mailing list > > Emb...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Embedlets-developer mailing list > Emb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer > |