I would like to study the effect of static electric field on electron localization function (in a particular material). Is that possible in Elk? If yes - how should I do that?
Thanks.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
A more sophisitcated way would be to use TDDFT with a constantly increasing vector potential, E=-1/c dA(t)/dt. This would be a nice feature to include in Elk: I'll add it to the next release -- thanks.
Regards,
Kay.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
What do you mean by saw-tooth? Is that field strength-over-time saw-tooth, or strength-over-space?
INFO.OUT says it's 'Constant electric field applied across unit cell', so I guess it must be a uniform constant filed. Is it not?
From the code I can guess that it is rather a uniform field resuling in a saw-tooth (linear within unit cell) potential. Is that correct?
Also, the keyword is not in the manual, neither is potefield subroutine.
Best regards,
Andrew
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi,
I would like to study the effect of static electric field on electron localization function (in a particular material). Is that possible in Elk? If yes - how should I do that?
Thanks.
You can apply a saw-tooth electric field using:
A more sophisitcated way would be to use TDDFT with a constantly increasing vector potential, E=-1/c dA(t)/dt. This would be a nice feature to include in Elk: I'll add it to the next release -- thanks.
Regards,
Kay.
Thank you.
What do you mean by saw-tooth? Is that field strength-over-time saw-tooth, or strength-over-space?
INFO.OUT says it's 'Constant electric field applied across unit cell', so I guess it must be a uniform constant filed. Is it not?
From the code I can guess that it is rather a uniform field resuling in a saw-tooth (linear within unit cell) potential. Is that correct?
Also, the keyword is not in the manual, neither is potefield subroutine.
Best regards,
Andrew