Re: [Ejbca-develop] design

[Tomas G. <to...@pr...>]

> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
>         at 
> se.anatom.ejbca.ca.sign.RSASignSessionBean.ejbCreate(RSASignSessionBean.java:129)
>  
> Could we do this via an interface (of the factory) instead of using 
> reflection? This might make the process more rebust.

As long as it works, every improvement is good!

> Another question I have, could we make a baseCMPBean and baseSessionBean 
> with all basic cmp/session methods. I already saw we're doing this on 
> some places but not everywhere.

There is a base session bean as you point out, and it should be used 
everywhere.
A base entity bean would also be nice, I agree.

Looking forward to nice patches!

Regards,
Tomas