[Egrail-source-developer] AW: AW: eGrail-Source: looking for RPM-packager
Brought to you by:
anatolmayr
|
From: <egr...@li...> - 2001-05-03 19:41:43
|
Hello Andrew! Thanks for your congratulations - sometimes you have to make decisions :-= ) I agree that it would not be a good thing to integrate Apache, PHP and My= SQL into the RPM since they're widely used and easy to install. So your solution treating them as dependencies sounds good to us. What is really a problem are the needed tools as freetype, gd, and the number of perl-modules. Any hints on how to handle this? Binary - RPM's are the ones business-user want to have (like me :-)) regards, Anatol P.S.: it seems to be a good month for weddings :-) -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Andrew Nelson [mailto:ga...@ms...] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 02. Mai 2001 15:37 An: ana...@li... Betreff: Re: AW: eGrail-Source: looking for RPM-packager Honeymoon, huh? Likely story... ;) Congratulations! Ok, I've grabbed sources and am looking over the file. Seems fairly straightforward, but it leads me to ask a few things about design philosophy. Apache, MySQL, and PHP - these all come in RPM flavors, and RPM can treat them as dependencies. Is that the preferred course of action? I assumed a= s much, which means that the RPM won't do a lot of things that the perl installer does (like install them if they arent there), but it keeps RPM size down, and makes the package a lot more modular. I'd hate to see peop= le have to uninstall their webserver just to remove one component cleanly. Again, I gathered that this was the direction you wanted to go anyway, bu= t I've been known to have a brain made out of pork rinds on occasion, so I always like to check :) Source RPM, or binary? The eternal question... no reason we can't do both= , of course, but I find most people who want source grab it in tarball version, and most people who bother with RPM just want the binaries (thou= gh "binary" is something of a misnomer in this case, there are binary files = in there somewhere I'm assuming - havent finished looking. Of course, it cou= ld be that pork rinds thing again). Oh, I'm on the mailing list now too :) Anyway, I've work to do before I leave for vacation (just a short one, ha= ve to go see a friend get married) but I'll probably get to hacking on the packager this weekend. Cheers, Andrew |