You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(21) |
2007 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(26) |
2008 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(3) |
2009 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(37) |
Dec
(18) |
2010 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(103) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(134) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(8) |
2011 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(19) |
2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(3) |
2013 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(16) |
2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(39) |
2015 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(5) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
2020 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2025 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Philippe de R. <ph...@fr...> - 2007-01-10 04:57:54
|
Hello, eclipse seems to go into endless loop when you type X = f(X), Y = f(Y), X = Y. Philippe |
From: Daniel R. <dan...@gm...> - 2007-01-09 15:36:56
|
Thanks everybody for your fast and precise answers. En/na Kish Shen ha escrit: > Marco Gavanelli wrote: > >> Daniel Riera wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am working at the moment with a set of variables related to "objects". >>> For instance, >>> I can have an object Person, with member variables Age [0..100], weight >>> [1..200], >>> height [20..230], etc. >>> At the moment I am storing these variables in a list of lists, but I >>> would like to know >>> how to do this using a structure (if possible) to improve the program >>> reading. >>> >>> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> You can define a structure with >> >> :- local struct(person(age,weight,height)). >> >> and then access the fields with "with". >> >> You can have a look at the manual page with >> >> help(struct/1). >> >> Cheers, >> Marco >> >> >> >> > Hi Daniel and Marco, > > We introduced a new syntax for the structure notation that is more > compact: instead of with ..., you can use {}, e.g. > > person{weight:50,age:10} instead of person with [weight:50,age:10] > > Cheers, > > Kish > > > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-Users mailing list > ECL...@cr... > http://www.crosscoreop.com/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-users > > |
From: Kish S. <ki...@ci...> - 2007-01-09 08:16:59
|
Marco Gavanelli wrote: > Daniel Riera wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am working at the moment with a set of variables related to "objects". >> For instance, >> I can have an object Person, with member variables Age [0..100], weight >> [1..200], >> height [20..230], etc. >> At the moment I am storing these variables in a list of lists, but I >> would like to know >> how to do this using a structure (if possible) to improve the program >> reading. >> > > Hi Daniel, > > You can define a structure with > > :- local struct(person(age,weight,height)). > > and then access the fields with "with". > > You can have a look at the manual page with > > help(struct/1). > > Cheers, > Marco > > > Hi Daniel and Marco, We introduced a new syntax for the structure notation that is more compact: instead of with ..., you can use {}, e.g. person{weight:50,age:10} instead of person with [weight:50,age:10] Cheers, Kish |
From: Matthew F. <mc...@gm...> - 2007-01-09 06:57:17
|
Hey, After compiling QuickTest.java, with the command javac -classpath /Users/matt/eclipse/lib/eclipse.jar: QuickTest.java when I subsequently try and run the quick test I get a Null Pointer Exception, I figure that I have not set the directory correctly but it is /Users/matt/eclipse and I can run eclipse from the command line so im not sure what is going on. java -classpath /Users/matt/eclipse/lib/eclipse.jar: - Declipse.directory=/Users/matt/eclipse QuickTest Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at com.parctechnologies.eclipse.EmbeddedEclipse.loadEclipse( EmbeddedEclipse.java:312) at com.parctechnologies.eclipse.EmbeddedEclipse.processOptions( EmbeddedEclipse.java:234) at com.parctechnologies.eclipse.EmbeddedEclipse.<init>( EmbeddedEclipse.java:164) at com.parctechnologies.eclipse.EmbeddedEclipse.getInstance( EmbeddedEclipse.java:124) at QuickTest.main(QuickTest.java:44) |
From: Marco G. <mar...@un...> - 2007-01-08 20:39:53
|
Daniel Riera wrote: > Hello, > > I am working at the moment with a set of variables related to "objects". > For instance, > I can have an object Person, with member variables Age [0..100], weight > [1..200], > height [20..230], etc. > At the moment I am storing these variables in a list of lists, but I > would like to know > how to do this using a structure (if possible) to improve the program > reading. Hi Daniel, You can define a structure with :- local struct(person(age,weight,height)). and then access the fields with "with". You can have a look at the manual page with help(struct/1). Cheers, Marco -- Marco Gavanelli, Ph.D. Computer Science Division Dipartimento di Ingegneria University of Ferrara Via Saragat 1 - 44100 Ferrara (Italy) Tel +39-0532-97-4833 Fax +39-0532-97-4870 http://www.ing.unife.it/docenti/MarcoGavanelli/ |
From: Paulo M. <pm...@di...> - 2007-01-08 19:38:32
|
On 2007/01/08, at 10:41, Daniel Riera wrote: > I am working at the moment with a set of variables related to > "objects". > For instance, > I can have an object Person, with member variables Age [0..100], > weight > [1..200], > height [20..230], etc. > At the moment I am storing these variables in a list of lists, but I > would like to know > how to do this using a structure (if possible) to improve the program > reading. By using Logtalk with ECLiPSe? Cheers, Paulo ----------------------------------------------------------------- Paulo Jorge Lopes de Moura Dep. of Computer Science, University of Beira Interior 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal Office 4.3 Ext. 3257 Phone: +351 275319891 Fax: +351 275319899 Email: <mailto:pm...@di...> Home page: <http://www.di.ubi.pt/~pmoura> Research: <http://logtalk.org/> ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Daniel R. <dan...@gm...> - 2007-01-08 18:42:23
|
Hello, I am working at the moment with a set of variables related to "objects". For instance, I can have an object Person, with member variables Age [0..100], weight [1..200], height [20..230], etc. At the moment I am storing these variables in a list of lists, but I would like to know how to do this using a structure (if possible) to improve the program reading. Thank you very much indeed and my best for all the members of the ECLIPSE team, Daniel Riera |
From: Kish S. <ki...@ci...> - 2007-01-08 04:03:12
|
Philippe de Rochambeau wrote: > Hello, > > is there an equivalent to the 'listing' command in Eclipse? > > I would like to list the facts and rules which I just compiled from > source code, if that's possible. > > Thanks. > > Philippe > > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-Users mailing list > ECL...@cr... > http://www.crosscoreop.com/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-users > The listing/0 predicate exists in ECLiPSe (you can actually check if a predicate is `built-in' by the help/1 predicate: [eclipse 4]: help listing. ) Currently, listing/0 will only show dynamic predicates (essentially predicates that are not `compiled' in the normal way, and which you can add or remove clauses dynamically), which you should declare with a dynamic/1 directive. Normally you don't want to declare your predicates as dynamic unless you want to modify them. In this case, they would not be shown by listing/0. However, you can see the source code for your predicate using the predicate browser tool in tkeclipse: by selecting the predicate you are interested in and clicking the `Show source' button. [this assumes your predicate definitions are contiguous] Cheers, Kish |
From: Kish S. <ki...@ci...> - 2007-01-08 03:32:29
|
Paulo Moura wrote: > On 2007/01/06, at 23:25, Philippe de Rochambeau wrote: > > >> Could someone please explain why my procedure clauses should be >> "consecutive"? >> > > See the ECLiPSe documentation on the discontiguous/1 directive. > > Paulo > > > The discontigous directive allow claises for predicates to be discontigous, but it is generally not a good idea to have discontigous definitions of predicates -- it is best to keep all the clauses for a particular predicate together, In Philippe's example: wizard(ron). hasWand(harry). wizard(X):- hasBroom(X), hasWand(X). The definition of wizard/1 is seperated by the defintion of hasWand/1. You can keep your definitions together in this way: wizard(ron). wizard(X) :- hasBroom(X), hasWand(X). hasWand(harry). .. You should keep your definitions for a predicatde together because it is easier to read and uinderstand your code, and also it is easier to catch spelling errors in the predicate names -- if you have many wizard/1 clauses, and one of them is misspelt (e.g. you have wizrd(harry) instead of wizard(harry)), this will show up as a discontigous error if wizd(harry) is not the last clause of your wizard/1 definitions). Cheers Kish Shen |
From: Paulo M. <pm...@di...> - 2007-01-07 21:50:53
|
On 2007/01/06, at 23:25, Philippe de Rochambeau wrote: > Could someone please explain why my procedure clauses should be > "consecutive"? See the ECLiPSe documentation on the discontiguous/1 directive. Paulo ----------------------------------------------------------------- Paulo Jorge Lopes de Moura Dep. of Computer Science, University of Beira Interior 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal Office 4.3 Ext. 3257 Phone: +351 275319891 Fax: +351 275319899 Email: <mailto:pm...@di...> Home page: <http://www.di.ubi.pt/~pmoura> Research: <http://logtalk.org/> ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Philippe de R. <ph...@fr...> - 2007-01-07 07:34:02
|
Hello, is there an equivalent to the 'listing' command in Eclipse? I would like to list the facts and rules which I just compiled from source code, if that's possible. Thanks. Philippe |
From: Philippe de R. <ph...@fr...> - 2007-01-07 07:25:49
|
Hello, whenever I compile the following code from the book "Learn Prolog Now!", wizard(ron). hasWand(harry). wizard(X):- hasBroom(X), hasWand(X). quidditchPlayer(harry). hasBroom(X) :- quidditchPlayer(X). I get the following message, *** procedure clauses are not consecutive: wizard / 1 before line 6 in the file /Applications/eclipse/myscripts/ harry.pl harry.pl compiled traceable 116 bytes in 0.00 seconds Yes (0.00s cpu) Could someone please explain why my procedure clauses should be "consecutive"? Many thanks. Best regards, Philippe |
From: Matthew F. <mc...@gm...> - 2007-01-04 02:55:49
|
Hi there, I am trying to use the Java/ECLiPSe interface (Version 5.10 #40 of eclipse) on MacOS X. I have set the $DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH and this is the command and error I get when I try and run the quick test. java -classpath ~/eclipse/lib/eclipse.jar: - Declipse.directory=~/eclipse/ QuickTest.java Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: QuickTest/java Any help would be great thanks. -Matt |
From: Joachim S. <j.s...@cr...> - 2006-12-20 01:13:12
|
David Tian wrote: > Hi, > > I used "-g3G" option set eclipse to take maximum 3GB of global/trail stack at > runtime. However, my program crashed with the following error: > > *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection! > You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack. > Peak sizes were: global stack 131008 kbytes, trail stack 19136 kbytes > Abort I think what happened here is that eclipse ignored your -g3G option because there should be a space between -g and the size. Try with -g 1G. You can then call get_flag(max_global_trail,X) to see if the limit is as you expected. This is obviously not very user friendly behaviour, i'll file a bug report about it... -- Joachim |
From: Kish S. <kis...@cr...> - 2006-12-19 12:59:25
|
On Saturday 16 December 2006 22:18, William Heath wrote: > Hi All Eclipse users, > > I want to know how to remove a constraint after I have applied it. Is that > possible, if so how? Could you show me an example? > The easiest way to `remove' a constraint is to backtrack over the posting of the constraint. Backtracking occurs naturally as part of the search process. Examples of this is given in many of the examples, for example, see the bin packing example in the ECLiPSe tutorial: http://eclipse.crosscoreop.com/doc/tutorial/tutorial061.html Cheers, Kish |
From: Kish S. <K....@cr...> - 2006-12-19 02:28:32
|
ph...@fr... wrote: > Hello, > > could someone please explain to me the difference between CLIPS and Eclipse? Is > Eclipse an offshoot of the CLIPS project? > > I don't know what CLIPS you are referring to, but we (ECLiPSe) are not related to any CLIPS project. ECLiPSe grew out of the research at ECRC in Germany in the 1980s. > Furthermore, how does Eclipse's Prolog differ from vanilla Prolog? Last but not > least, what are the advantages of Eclipse over SWI-Prolog? > > By vanilla Prolog, I assume you mean `standard' Prolog. ECLiPSe has basically the syntax you see in most textbooks for Prolog. It does have various syntatic extensions such as logical loops and named structures. However, the main extra feature of ECLiPSe is the support of various constraint solvers. You can go to the ECLiPSe website (www.eclipse-clp.org), and look at the features page for more detail. As for comparison with SWI-Prolog, I don't think SWI-Prolog have much support for constraint solvers, as it is mainly a `pure' Prolog system. I think the execution speed for Prolog code is also somewhat faster in ECLiPSe, although I have not made any recent comparisons. [but if pure Prolog speed is what you are after, then there are other Prologs such as Yap which is probably faster than ECLiPSe] Cheers, Kish > Many thanks. > > Philippe > > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-Users mailing list > ECL...@cr... > http://www.crosscoreop.com/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-users > |
From: <ph...@fr...> - 2006-12-18 16:12:51
|
Hello, could someone please explain to me the difference between CLIPS and Eclipse? Is Eclipse an offshoot of the CLIPS project? Furthermore, how does Eclipse's Prolog differ from vanilla Prolog? Last but not least, what are the advantages of Eclipse over SWI-Prolog? Many thanks. Philippe |
From: Kish S. <ki...@ci...> - 2006-12-18 11:22:39
|
Hi, The memory flags such as -g specifies the maximum amount of memory that ECLiPSe will allow for that memory area (-g for global stack). It does *not* mean that your machine actually have the specified amount of memory available.You get stack overflow when you run out of available memory, which can be less than what flags such as -g specifies. The maximum amount of memory available on your machine is the amount of real + virtual memory of your machine. No program can use more memory that this. Do you know how much total memory your machine have? Secondly, if you are sharing your machine with other users/processes, then you can run out of memory before you reach the total amount of memory your machine has, because other processes are using some of the memory. In this case, you should be able to use more memory when your machine is less busy. Cheers, Kish David Tian wrote: > Hi, > > I used "-g3G" option set eclipse to take maximum 3GB of global/trail stack at > runtime. However, my program crashed with the following error: > > *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection! > You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack. > Peak sizes were: global stack 131008 kbytes, trail stack 19136 kbytes > Abort > > I thought the amount of global/trail stack was not enough and checked the stacks > usage for previous session using "statistics." and got the following > information: > > global_stack_used: 1192 bytes > global_stack_allocated: 4259840 bytes > global_stack_peak: 134152192 bytes > trail_stack_used: 200 bytes > trail_stack_allocated: 2162688 bytes > trail_stack_peak: 19595264 bytes > > I expected to see that global_stack_peak was as big as 3GB, but > global_stack_peak (134152192 bytes) was alot less than 3GB. Does this mean it > was not the shortage of memory which caused the program to crash? So what could > cause my program to crash and caused the error message to be displayed? > > Many thanks, > David > > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-Users mailing list > ECL...@cr... > http://www.crosscoreop.com/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-users > |
From: David T. <D.T...@po...> - 2006-12-18 08:11:35
|
Hi, I used "-g3G" option set eclipse to take maximum 3GB of global/trail stack at runtime. However, my program crashed with the following error: *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection! You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack. Peak sizes were: global stack 131008 kbytes, trail stack 19136 kbytes Abort I thought the amount of global/trail stack was not enough and checked the stacks usage for previous session using "statistics." and got the following information: global_stack_used: 1192 bytes global_stack_allocated: 4259840 bytes global_stack_peak: 134152192 bytes trail_stack_used: 200 bytes trail_stack_allocated: 2162688 bytes trail_stack_peak: 19595264 bytes I expected to see that global_stack_peak was as big as 3GB, but global_stack_peak (134152192 bytes) was alot less than 3GB. Does this mean it was not the shortage of memory which caused the program to crash? So what could cause my program to crash and caused the error message to be displayed? Many thanks, David |
From: Kish S. <ki...@ci...> - 2006-12-18 08:05:15
|
Hi Philippe, Philippe de Rochambeau wrote: > Thanks for the information, Joachim. > > eclipse, jeclipse, and tkeclipse all run now. > > Here's the contents of my /Applications/eclipse/lib/ppc_macosx/lib/ > SITE_PARAMS file, for those who might be interested. > > Please note that daVinci is not installed on my machine and neither > are tcl and tk, and that does not seem to prevent [tk]eclipse from > working. > I am not quite sure how tkeclipse can run without Tcl/Tk installed. Do you get a tkeclipse window when you run tkeclipse? If you do, you must have Tcl/Tk installed somewhere. We don't include Tcl/Tk in our distribution, and your TCL_LIBRARY and TK_LIBRARY seems to point to where ECLiPSe puts Tcl/Tk if you are not using a standard system Tcl/Tk. What is in the directory /Applications/eclipse/tcltk/ppc_macosx/? Cheers, Kish > Best regards, > > Philippe > > > ECLIPSEDIR='/Applications/eclipse' > EXE_DIR='/Applications/eclipse/bin/ppc_macosx' > SIMPLE="y" > WANT_MEGALOG="n" > WANT_PARALLELISM="n" > WANT_TCL_WM="y" > WANT_MPS="n" > REBUILD_DOCS="n" > TCL_LIBRARY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/lib/tcl8.4' > TK_LIBRARY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/lib/tk8.4' > DAVINCIHOME='$ECLIPSEDIR/daVinci/ppc_macosx' > TCL_ARCH_LIBRARY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/ppc_macosx/lib' > WISH_DIRECTORY='/usr/bin' > XWISH_DIRECTORY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/ppc_macosx/bin' > TCL_VERSION='4' > TCL_FRAMEWORK='/System/Library/Frameworks' > X_LIBRARIES='@x_libraries@' > USER_OBJECTS='' > JRE_HOME='/usr/' > > > > On 16 déc. 06, at 21:17, Joachim Schimpf wrote: > > >> Philippe de Rochambeau wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> has anyone managed to successfully build Eclipse on Macosx 10.4? >>> >> The SourceForge site http://sourceforge.net/projects/eclipse-clp >> has binaries for ECLiPSe 5.10#39, built on Macosx 10.2. See also >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php? >> thread_id=1615796&forum_id=613916 >> >> Actually, since at the moment we don't have any Macs of our own, >> it would be ideal if someone else could volunteer to look after >> the MacOS builds. Anyone? >> >> >> >>> The INSTALL file says should set the ECLIPSETHIRDPARTY environment >>> variable to /vol/Eclipse/thirdparty. However, there is no >>> directory called thirdparty in the source directory. Furthermore, >>> apart from gmp, none of the required third-party components are >>> available from either darwinports.opendarwin.org or fink >>> >> We'll try to improve the documentation on that. I've put >> a recent version of the build guide on the web site >> http://eclipse.crosscoreop.com/reports/SetupGuideV2.pdf >> >> >> - Joachim >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-Users mailing list > ECL...@cr... > http://www.crosscoreop.com/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-users > |
From: Philippe de R. <ph...@fr...> - 2006-12-18 01:53:48
|
Thanks for the information, Joachim. eclipse, jeclipse, and tkeclipse all run now. Here's the contents of my /Applications/eclipse/lib/ppc_macosx/lib/ SITE_PARAMS file, for those who might be interested. Please note that daVinci is not installed on my machine and neither are tcl and tk, and that does not seem to prevent [tk]eclipse from working. Best regards, Philippe ECLIPSEDIR='/Applications/eclipse' EXE_DIR='/Applications/eclipse/bin/ppc_macosx' SIMPLE="y" WANT_MEGALOG="n" WANT_PARALLELISM="n" WANT_TCL_WM="y" WANT_MPS="n" REBUILD_DOCS="n" TCL_LIBRARY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/lib/tcl8.4' TK_LIBRARY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/lib/tk8.4' DAVINCIHOME='$ECLIPSEDIR/daVinci/ppc_macosx' TCL_ARCH_LIBRARY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/ppc_macosx/lib' WISH_DIRECTORY='/usr/bin' XWISH_DIRECTORY='/Applications/eclipse/tcltk/ppc_macosx/bin' TCL_VERSION='4' TCL_FRAMEWORK='/System/Library/Frameworks' X_LIBRARIES='@x_libraries@' USER_OBJECTS='' JRE_HOME='/usr/' On 16 déc. 06, at 21:17, Joachim Schimpf wrote: > Philippe de Rochambeau wrote: >> Hello, >> has anyone managed to successfully build Eclipse on Macosx 10.4? > > The SourceForge site http://sourceforge.net/projects/eclipse-clp > has binaries for ECLiPSe 5.10#39, built on Macosx 10.2. See also > http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php? > thread_id=1615796&forum_id=613916 > > Actually, since at the moment we don't have any Macs of our own, > it would be ideal if someone else could volunteer to look after > the MacOS builds. Anyone? > > >> The INSTALL file says should set the ECLIPSETHIRDPARTY environment >> variable to /vol/Eclipse/thirdparty. However, there is no >> directory called thirdparty in the source directory. Furthermore, >> apart from gmp, none of the required third-party components are >> available from either darwinports.opendarwin.org or fink > > We'll try to improve the documentation on that. I've put > a recent version of the build guide on the web site > http://eclipse.crosscoreop.com/reports/SetupGuideV2.pdf > > > - Joachim > |
From: William H. <wg...@gm...> - 2006-12-17 06:18:50
|
Hi All Eclipse users, I want to know how to remove a constraint after I have applied it. Is that possible, if so how? Could you show me an example? Thanks, Tim |
From: Joachim S. <js...@cr...> - 2006-12-17 04:18:14
|
Philippe de Rochambeau wrote: > Hello, > > has anyone managed to successfully build Eclipse on Macosx 10.4? The SourceForge site http://sourceforge.net/projects/eclipse-clp has binaries for ECLiPSe 5.10#39, built on Macosx 10.2. See also http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1615796&forum_id=613916 Actually, since at the moment we don't have any Macs of our own, it would be ideal if someone else could volunteer to look after the MacOS builds. Anyone? > > The INSTALL file says should set the ECLIPSETHIRDPARTY environment > variable to /vol/Eclipse/thirdparty. However, there is no directory > called thirdparty in the source directory. Furthermore, apart from gmp, > none of the required third-party components are available from either > darwinports.opendarwin.org or fink We'll try to improve the documentation on that. I've put a recent version of the build guide on the web site http://eclipse.crosscoreop.com/reports/SetupGuideV2.pdf - Joachim |
From: Philippe de R. <ph...@fr...> - 2006-12-16 16:28:48
|
Hello, has anyone managed to successfully build Eclipse on Macosx 10.4? The INSTALL file says should set the ECLIPSETHIRDPARTY environment variable to /vol/Eclipse/thirdparty. However, there is no directory called thirdparty in the source directory. Furthermore, apart from gmp, none of the required third-party components are available from either darwinports.opendarwin.org or fink export ECLIPSETHIRDPARTY=/vol/Eclipse/thirdparty this points to the location of third-party components that ECLiPSe builds interfaces for, e.g. gmp, cplex, xpress-mp, flexlm, graphviz, grappa. Configure will detect the presence of components there and build interfaces if possible. Best regards, Philippe |
From: Kish S. <ki...@ci...> - 2006-12-14 21:59:35
|
Hi, David Tian wrote: > Hi, > > I followed the installation process as follows: > ./UNPACK_5_10_39_i386_linux > which unpacks and untar eclipse_basic_5_10_39_i386_linux.tgz. > Then run the installation script for the software: > ./RUNME > > However, when I typed ./UNPACK_5_10_39_i386_linux, following error message > displayed: > ./UNPACK_5_10_39_i386_linux: No such file or directory > > even I was in the dir where UNPACK_5_10_39_i386_linux is located and > UNPACK_5_10_39_i386_linux is set to be executable. > > BTW, I am using bash on Linux. > > Many thanks, > > David > > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-Users mailing list > ECL...@cr... > http://www.crosscoreop.com/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-users > It may be a permission problem, but it is difficult to say for sure without looking at your setup. However, the UNPACK script does very little, it basically untars the packages you have. You can just untar the packages yourself. You can look at the UNPACK script to see how this is done, but if you can't access it, just do something like tar -zxvf eclipse_basic_5_10_39_i386_linux.tgz Cheers, Kish |