From: <kla...@sd...> - 2005-06-21 18:22:02
|
Hi all, sorry for my silence - but unfortunately i'm currently quite busy and had not found any time for this topic..... Eric, could you please send me again this email which includes the example you mentioned?! Thanks, Klaus -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Eric M. Ludlam [mailto:er...@si...] Gesendet: Di 21.06.2005 15:54 An: Daniel Debertin Cc: air...@no...; Berndl, Klaus; = ecb...@li... Betreff: Re[2]: [CEDET-devel] [ECB-list] Parent classes aren't jump-able =20 Hi, I'm trying to reconcile all the email I've gotten since I posted 1.0pre2, and I don't remember where this conversation ended. Were changes in semantic-go-to-tag needed? Klaus, did you need assistance getting ECB to work with the C++ namespace example I had given? Thanks Eric >>> Daniel Debertin <air...@no...> seems to think that: >[ Following up to my own post .. sorry for the spam ] > >Daniel Debertin <air...@no...> writes: > >> (defun type-list-find-type (type-list type-name) >[ ... ] > >It occurs to me that semantic-deep-find-tags-by-name would work >here. We've already narrowed the context to the set of types that are >in-scope at point in the current buffer, so the fact that it flattens >the tag-tree doesn't matter ... right? > >TIA, > >Dan >-- >Dan Debertin |=20 >ai...@no... |=20 >www.nodewarrior.org |=20 > --=20 Eric Ludlam: za...@gn..., = er...@si... Home: http://www.ludlam.net Siege: www.siege-engine.com Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net GNU: www.gnu.org |