From: Javier O. <a08...@dl...> - 2004-10-28 19:09:29
|
Unfortunately, there is nothing I can do about it. This is a system file implemented years ago...it only gets bigger. I have to live with it. :-( ---------Included Message---------- >Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:29:16 -0400 >From: "Barry, Christopher" <cb...@in...> >To: <ecb...@li...> >Subject: OT:RE: [ECB-list] Re: [CEDET-devel] ECB/CEDET question > >Off Topic a bit, but I'm curious: why don't you modularize the header >into sub-headers that are #included from this header. This won't break >everywhere this header is included, and makes managing all of the >sub-header information way easier, in bite-sized chunks. > >-C > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: er...@si... [mailto:er...@si...] >> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 2:50 PM >> To: j-o...@ti... >> Cc: kla...@sd...; ecb...@li...; >> ced...@li... >> Subject: [ECB-list] Re: [CEDET-devel] ECB/CEDET question >> >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:28:06 -0500, "Oviedo, Javier" wrote: >> > Hello all. I'm not sure exactly which group to post this to, so I >> > thought I'd let you all decide. >> > >> > I'm using the latest ECB/CEDET with emacs 21.3. >> > >> > I have this INCREDIBLY, RIDICULOUSLY HUGE header file that >> I must often >> > open in emacs. It is the main API for our entire software >> architecture. >> > This thing is so BIG that it makes it impossible to use EBC/CEDET >> > because emacs gets really, REALLY slow. Presumably, >> semantic is parsing >> > and/or doing some processing when I move the cursor around. >> > >> > The way I see it, there are two options in getting around >> this problem: >> > >> > 1. deactivate ecb, which in turn turns off semantic. >> > 2. leave ecb activated, but somehow tell semantic not to >> parse (or do >> > whatever it does) this file when it is opened and visited in emacs. >> > >> > Out of these two choices, I would prefer number two because >> I find it >> > very annoying to deactivate then reactivate ecb every time >> I visit and >> > leave the file. >> > >> > How can I accomplish the second choice? Hopefully I did not missing >> > anything to terribly obvious in the documentation. >> > >> > Is there another solution to my problem? Please feel free >> to chime in. >> > >> > Thanks a lot guys! >> >> Check out the help for semantic--before-fetch-tags-hook. >> It should be possible to write a hook that detects your mondo-header >> and returns nil. >> >> It should also be possible to allow this header to be parsed once, >> saved, then used via the semanticdb calls for all future use, and >> disabled for small updates. >> >> Eric >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on >> ITManagersJournal >> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of >> them. Give us >> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to >> find out more >> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl >> _______________________________________________ >> Ecb-list mailing list >> Ecb...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecb-list >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: >Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE >LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id065&opick >_______________________________________________ >Ecb-list mailing list >Ecb...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecb-list > > ---------End of Included Message---------- |