From: Mikhail P. <pa...@mi...> - 2004-04-26 13:43:32
|
## On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:17:27 +0200 ## you wrote: BK> But we had some similar problems with c++ some weeks ago and here BK> was the reason a different syntax-table in files with major- BK> mode c++-mode. How has it been fixed? BK> Please try the following test: BK> 1. Open the file which contains the small c++-code you sent me so it BK> is an Emacs-buffer. BK> 2. Call C-u M-x semantic-lex-test RET BK> (means run the command `semantic-lex-test' with a prefix argument) BK> 3. Check the result and send it to me. BK> BTW: Here is the result i got from this command: BK> semantic-c-lexer: ((punctuation 1 . 2) (INCLUDE 2 . 9) (system-include 10 . 18) (USING 20 . 25) (NAMESPACE 26 . 35) (symbol 36 . 39) (punctuation 39 . 40) (CLASS 42 . 47) (symbol 48 . 49) (semantic-list 50 . 124) (punctuation 124 . 125) (symbol 127 . 128) (symbol 129 . 132) (semantic-list 132 . 134) (semantic-list 134 . 145)) semantic-c-lexer: ((punctuation 1 . 2) (INCLUDE 2 . 9) (system-include 10 . 18) (USING 20 . 25) (NAMESPACE 26 . 35) (symbol 36 . 39) (punctuation 39 . 40) (CLASS 42 .47) (symbol 48 .49) (semantic-list 50-119) (punctuation 119 . 120) (symbol 122 . 123) (symbol 124 .127) (semantic-list 127 . 129) (semantic-list 129 . 140)) It looks very similar. BK> Does this help? No, I still get the same as before. I was thinking that it may conflict with some options in my config but running it with config file which includes only parts about cedet and ecb does not change anything. Best wishes, Mikhail |