From: Jan S. <ja...@bi...> - 2003-03-18 17:49:08
|
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:46:02 +0100, Berndl, Klaus <kla...@sd...> wrote: >> This question is probably only partly related to ECB in particular, but >> I figure someone out there should be of help. > > It is not related to ECB! Okay, it isn't. But my next question which relates to it will be. :) > At least AFAIK... ;-) Okay, what I had to do was run a cmd subprocess as my compile command. Now, if the cursor isn't positioned at the BOTTOM of the buffer, it doesn't scroll. It just displays what it has space for, and outputs to the buffer without me seeing what's going on. Is there a way for me to automagically set the cursor to the bottom of the buffer? I ask because if I switch to the compile buffer while it's compiling and then switch away, ECB decides that it doesn't matter that I'm still compiling, and since I've visited the buffer and then gone to a different one, it'll shrink it back to its minimum size. I'd like to be able to see the compile output and work in my edit buffers at the same time, with the compile buffer at its pre-set maximum size. If that's no possible, no big. I'm just lazy. :) JS -- Jan Sacharuk Programmer BioWare Corp. ja...@bi... |