|
From: Ryan W. <rya...@in...> - 2015-01-20 20:54:51
|
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Christian Hilberg < hi...@ke...> wrote: > Am Dienstag 20 Januar 2015, um 17:05:30 schrieb Christian Hilberg: > > Hi all, > > > > Am Dienstag 20 Januar 2015, um 16:34:58 schrieb Ryan Ware: > > > All, > > > > > > I'll be getting ready to do a release of ECB 2.50 in the next couple > > > of weeks. I'm still cleaning some things up, but things seem stable > > > (at least to me) and I wanted to do a beta release so other people can > > > give it a try and give feedback. > > > > > > There are no grand, sweeping changes in this release. It will consist > of: > > > [...] > > > If you have any questions, let me know. > > > > Not having played yet with 2.5-dev but looking into the branch, > > it seems to me that the ECB code base now comes without any > > licensing information. 1d4748408a887c2b204e77bfc452eec8bd086430 > > removes any remnants of the GPL, at least code-wise. There also > > does not seem to exist a COPYING file or something alike > > (pls correct me if I'm mistaken). > > > > Surely, there should be some licensing information included, > > what do you think? > > Argh, sorry for the noise! There's the license info sitting > right beneath my eyes. It really helps if one reads the code. :) > > However, let me propose adding a COPYING file to the toplevel. > I completely agree that it is appropriate. Would you mind adding it as an issue at the Github site (ecb-home)? Ryan |