|
From: <om...@no...> - 2003-12-11 07:47:03
|
Mayne, Peter wrote: > We have signed messages being successfully passed back and forth betwee= n=20 > us and our business partner (using Hermes from a CVS export this mornin= g). >=20 > They can send us a signed message, and our signed sync ack is sent and=20 > received successfully. >=20 > However, if we send them a signed message, their signed sync ack is not= =20 > verified, due to the calculated digest being different to the unverifie= d=20 > digest. >=20 > If I add some debugging code to write the bad message to a file, and us= e=20 > the signature tool to verify it, it verifies correctly. >=20 > Does anyone have any idea why a signed syn ack might not verify=20 > correctly in Hermes, but verify correctly with the signature tool? >=20 > (This leads to another feature request. Can an option be added to Herme= s=20 > so that bad messages are written to a "bad messages" directory, so we=20 > can investigate them, rather than being thrown away, which makes proble= m=20 > solving a bit difficult.) >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > PJDM > --=20 > Peter Mayne > Technology Consultant > Spherion Technology Solutions > Level 1, 243 Northbourne Avenue, Lyneham, ACT, 2602 > T: 61 2 62689727 F: 61 2 62689777 >=20 Peter, I think I saw the same some weeks ago. For me, this current version=20 does'nt verify acknowledge signature and original sended message=20 signature, as explained in ebxml.org "Message Service Specification 2.0"=20 6.3.2.5 lines 1560 to 1563. Actually, this is the only one variation to the normative document, I met. We resolve the this by patching the code. Regards, Olivier Mo=EFses |