|
From: Ronald v. K. <rv...@ab...> - 2003-04-06 12:23:50
|
stupid me... i should have known... (it was late, real late when I did this) Ng Chi Yuen [Cyng] probeerde het volgende duidelijk te maken op 05-04-03 15:43: >Hi, > > > >>Is there a reason that e.g. statusRequest and StatusResponse are in the >>HeaderContainer? They belong in a SOAPBody, which is done right, but for >>one reason or another I expected all elements which belong in a SOAPBody >>to be handled by a BodyContainer. There does not exist one, but it would >>improve the api, or am i wrong? >> >> > > The term "HeaderContainer" is borrowed from ebMS2.0 specification >(2.1.3 and Figure 2.1) which means to be a MIME part consisting of a >SOAPMessage. It does not specifically means SOAPHeader. > >Regards, >CY > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Ng Chi Yuen, CY. cy...@ce... http://www.cecid.hku.hk/ >Technology Officer, >Centre for E-Commerce Infrastructure Development, >The University of Hong Kong >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: >Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! >No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server >http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ >_______________________________________________ >ebxmlms-develop mailing list >ebx...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ebxmlms-develop > > |