[ebxmlms-general] Re: Hermes 1.0.0.1 available at freebxml

[Patrick Y. <kc...@ce...>]

Dear all,
There is a bug report (so fast!!) on the version 1.0.0.1. So we fixed 
it, committed to sourceforge, and updated the packages at freebxml. We 
are still using the version number as 1.0.0.1. Please note and sorry for 
the inconvenience caused.

...p

Regards,
Patrick Yee
Center for E-Commerce Infrastructure Development

Making E-Commerce Everyday Commerce



Patrick Yee wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We are happy to announce Hermes 1.0.0.1.
>
> We have tagged the CVS head as r1001, and we have also updated the zip 
> files at freebxml.org to make them include the changes made at CVS 
> head so far. Please see the release note attached.
>
> Thank you for your support!
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Hermes 1.0.0.1 Release Note (12 Aug 2005)
>=========================================
>
>Enhancement
>1. Reject self-signed certificate when verifying digital signature. This is to prevent a potential problem when somebody used a self-signed certificate to spoof someone else with a correct applicaton context.
>2. Enhanced performance when large payload is received.
>3. Make use of prepared statement to enable database access optimization in some cases.
>4. Some code rearrangement to avoid overloading of database connection pool.
>
>Bugs Fixed
>1. Fixed several memory leak problems.
>2. Fixed the select criteria when doing archiving to ignore all undelivered message.
>3. Fixed an issue in file persistence, which we create a directory for archive only if it does not exist.
>4. Fixed a deadlock problem when delivery handler is working slow and at the same time a retry message comes in. 
>5. Fixed a problem which now the database is not updated if there is any problem in resolving outgoing URL.
>6. Fixed an issue in ebXML message packaging. Now the service element will be created correctly with type information.
>7. Fixed an issue when handling loopback message which may cause deadlock problem.
>8. Some code review to make the source code more consistent.
>  
>