Re: [ebxmlms-general] Connectionpooling and transactions

[Patrick Y. <pat...@gm...>]

Ronald, I agree with you. It should be ok to refactor those inner classes=
=20
too. ..p


On 7/21/05, Ronald van Kuijk <rtv...@xs...> wrote:
>=20
> Patrick,
>=20
> I'm totally aware of the security reasons, but for the other changes it i=
s=20
> easier to split it
> first. I can allways make innerclasses of it afterwards. But on the other=
=20
> hand, I'd solve the
> security issue by using a java.policy file. Isn't that what is was for=20
> originally? Not many
> developers know it and try to solve it in another way. One can even sign=
=20
> all hermes classes and
> have the important ones only be accessed by code that is also signed. Thi=
s=20
> keeps the classes much
> more clean imo.
>=20
> Ronald
>=20
>