Re: [ebxmlms-general] idea : use ebXML to bridge the gap, through JMS

[Patrick Y. <kc...@ce...>]

>
> I know, I don't want exclusivity for Java as well, but imo the 
> postoffice calls are kind of local. If things have to be transported 
> to a remote location, ebxml is used isn't it? The thing is, if you 
> want real reliability and be not dependend on including specific jms 
> libraries to access the specific jms server, you get into reliable 
> webservices and how small is the step then to ebxml. Kind of like a 
> lightweigt client (your ebxml smtp client, but then with some http calls)


Agreed. At some point, we have to assume simple calls are sufficient.

Regards, -Patrick