merge easymock and easymock-classextension
Brought to you by:
tammofreese
Menu
▾
▴
#13 merge easymock and easymock-classextension
closed
5
2012-10-05
2008-11-22
No
Usually when I use easymock, I need easymock.classextension as well. In such cases I need fully qualified names to distinquish the EasyMock classes.
It would be excellent if both projects were merged. Could as well lead to a reduction of currently duplicated code.
One could either distinquish the main classes by name ("EasyMockInterfaces" vs. "EasyMockClasses") or provide an intelligent EasyMock class that distinquishes itself from classes and interfaces.
I'm considering this option. One thing that can help you for now is that the class extension can also mock interface. So in fact, using only the class extension does it all.