Re: [dwsim-users] reactor application - ethyl acetate
Simulate chemical processes using advanced thermodynamic models
Brought to you by:
danwbr
|
From: Daniel W. <dan...@gm...> - 2016-04-27 13:42:18
|
Hector, the actual criteria for throwing the pressure drop error in the PFR model is a negative pressure value after the pressure drop calculation step: https://github.com/DanWBR/dwsim3/blob/master/DWSIM/Objects/Reactors/PFR.vb#L828 Hey, we live relatively close to each other. I'm in Manaus, Amazonas. Could we say that both of us live in the Amazon? :-) Regards, Daniel 2016-04-27 9:30 GMT-04:00 Hector Perez <hpe...@gm...>: > I see. Thank you Daniel for taking the time to answer my questions. I look > forward to continuing to use DWSIM and spread the word here in Colombia. > You've done an amazing job with this program. > > Have a nice day, > > Hector D. Perez > Chemical Engineering Consultant > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Daniel Wagner <dan...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Hi Hector, >> >> For liquids, a high pressure drop would be one that vaporizes part of >> it... for gases, I guess that it would be worse because gas properties are >> heavily dependent on pressure, and that can cause changes in concentrations >> and/or fugacities, impacting the final conversion. >> >> Regards >> Daniel >> >> >> 2016-04-27 9:22 GMT-04:00 Hector Perez <hpe...@gm...>: >> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> Thank you for the clarification. What is the criteria for "high pressure >>> drop" in a PFR? I'm seeing that in the acetate problem, DWSIM won't let me >>> go beyond a pressure drop of 0.23 atm. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Hector D. Perez >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Daniel Wagner <dan...@gm...> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Hector, >>>> >>>> I don't know how the volume calculation works on Aspen but, in DWSIM, I >>>> do the following: >>>> >>>> PFR code (use this for line number references in the text below): >>>> https://github.com/DanWBR/dwsim3/blob/master/DWSIM/Objects/Reactors/PFR.vb >>>> >>>> - For the PFR, if you have a reactor of volume X, and the volume delta >>>> is 0.05, then the ODE (ordinal differential equation system) mass balance >>>> calculation will be done in 0.05*X volume steps until the entire volume is >>>> calculated (line 832). If you don't care about the actual pressure drop >>>> calculation, you can enter any value for the reactor length. Just be sure >>>> to input a length that doesn't result in a high pressure drop across the >>>> reactor. DWSIM calculates the pressure drop using the reactor volume and >>>> length to estimate the internal diameter, then uses the Darcy formula to >>>> calculate pressure drop. If the reactor has a catalyst bed, then the Ergun >>>> formula is used (line 797). >>>> >>>> CSTR code (use this for line number references in the text below): >>>> https://github.com/DanWBR/dwsim3/blob/master/DWSIM/Objects/Reactors/CSTR.vb >>>> >>>> - For the CSTR, the entire reactor volume is used at once and the ODE >>>> system is solved one time only (lines 559/111). There is no pressure drop >>>> calculation because this is supposed to be a batch (tank) reactor. :-) >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2016-04-27 0:06 GMT-04:00 Hector Perez <hpe...@gm...>: >>>> >>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for sending the file along with the updated build! I actually >>>>> went through the file and included the reverse reaction by adjusting the >>>>> Reverse Order exponents (the Aspen Plus video has both forward and reverse >>>>> reactions). I also dropped the conversion on the Conversion reactor >>>>> (to~70%) and set the equilibrium constant (for the Equilibrium Reactor) to >>>>> be k_forward/k_reverse (ratio of rate constants). My numbers are now very >>>>> close, if not the same as the ASPEN simulation video. >>>>> >>>>> One thing I did run into is that the reactor dimensions for the PFR >>>>> and CSTR in the aspen video create errors in DWSIM. I had to decrease the >>>>> PFR length because it gave me a warning about the pressure drop being too >>>>> high. The CSTR volume also had to be decreased because it gave me a mass >>>>> balance error. Do you know why the aspen dimensions don't work? This could >>>>> perhaps be a lack of feasibility check on the ASPEN side. >>>>> >>>>> Also, what is "Volume Delta (Relative)" on the PFR specs? >>>>> >>>>> One other thing I checked was the CSTR duty (compared to the ASPEN >>>>> video) and found the DWSIM value to be about 6 times lower than the ASPEN >>>>> value (perhaps something having to do with the smaller volume used in >>>>> DWSIM?). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks once again. I am really liking this simulator. It seems easier >>>>> to use than aspen. >>>>> >>>>> Hector D. Perez >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Wagner <dan...@gm...> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Hector, >>>>>> >>>>>> By following the Aspen Plus video I was able to make it work, there >>>>>> is no reverse reaction. Also, there was a bug in the PFR pressure drop >>>>>> calculation, you'll have to use an updated build. Download it from this >>>>>> link and unpack the files in DWSIM's installation directory: >>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dwsim/files/DWSIM/DWSIM%203.7/Build5960.rar/download >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, I forgot to tell you that, for kinetic reactions, every >>>>>> compound in the reaction must be present even if in a small amount, i.e. >>>>>> 0.000001. 0 will give you an error. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can also try the updated simulation file, I've added the >>>>>> equilibrium reactor as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2016-04-26 18:17 GMT-04:00 Hector Perez <hpe...@gm...>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For kinetic reactions, what are the units on the activation energy? >>>>>>> (same units as those specified for the molar entropy?). I included the DO >>>>>>> and RO exponents as well as the base compound and now get a new error on >>>>>>> the CSTR: “An error occurred during the mass balance calculation. Check >>>>>>> reaction kinetics data and reactor sizing information as well.” >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The PFR gives me the error: “One or more flash specification values >>>>>>> are invalid. Please check the associated UO or Material Stream for >>>>>>> incorrect specifications or miscalculated values. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, I really appreciate your assistance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hector D. Perez >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From: *Daniel Wagner <dan...@gm...> >>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 26, 2016 3:59 PM >>>>>>> *To: *Hector Perez <hpe...@gm...> >>>>>>> *Cc: *dws...@li... >>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [dwsim-users] reactor application - ethyl acetate >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the existing reactions, you've missed the compound >>>>>>> concentrations' direct and reverse order exponents. You also didn't define >>>>>>> the base compound, which should be the main reactant. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the conversion and equilibrium reactors, you must define the >>>>>>> corresponding reactions. Kinetic reactions only work with the PFR and the >>>>>>> CSTR. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-04-26 16:43 GMT-04:00 Hector Perez <hpe...@gm...>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am trying to replicate the following ASPEN tutorial to set up the >>>>>>> liquid reaction for ethyl acetate formation from ethanol and acetic acid >>>>>>> using different types of reactors: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DOdlUDI-kI >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unfortunately, only the Gibbs reactor yielded any result with a >>>>>>> ethyl acetate flow that was 12 kmol/hr lower than the ASPEN simulation. The >>>>>>> only differences I can see is that the ASPEN simulation uses the NRTL-hoc, >>>>>>> whereas my simulation uses NRTL. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The conversion reactor had zero conversion and both the PFR and CSTR >>>>>>> reactors gave the error: "The given key was not present in the dictionary." >>>>>>> I'm not sure what this means. I tried different thermodynamic models >>>>>>> besides NRTL with no avail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will send my simulation file attached. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would really appreciate any light on the matter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Obrigado! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hector D. Perez >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chemical Engineering Consultant >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications >>>>>>> Manager >>>>>>> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into >>>>>>> multiple tiers of >>>>>>> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! >>>>>>> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Dwsim-users mailing list >>>>>>> Dws...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dwsim-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > |