Re: [Dspam-user] Accuracy of 91%, can I improve it?

[Chad M S. <Chad@Balius.com>]

On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote:

> It does not look like you have made anything incorrect. 91.5% accuracy 
> slightly after the training phase is not bad. What tokenizer are you 
> using?

Tokenizer osb


-Chad