[DrJava] [ drjava-Bugs-3178565 ] Order of classes in an un-named package matters

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #3178565, was opened at 2011-02-11 14:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by sp2verdandecom
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=438935&aid=3178565&group_id=44253

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Language Levels
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Steven Przybylski (sp2verdandecom)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Order of classes in an un-named package matters

Initial Comment:
The following compiles and runs:
 public class Program 
{
   public static void main(String[] args)
  {
    System.out.println("It runs" );
  }
}
 
 class Foo
{
   public  double foo1() { return (1.0);}
}

The following fails with a static error:
 class Foo
{
   public  double foo1() { return (1.0);}
}

 public class Program 
{
   public static void main(String[] args)
  {
    System.out.println("It runs" );
  }
}

I can't find where in the Java language specification the order of classes in a unnamed package is allowed to make a difference.


Thanks


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=438935&aid=3178565&group_id=44253