Re: [Dri-devel] MGA400, which kernel/CVS combination are you using? -- Reminder

[Michael M. <Michael@Meding.net>]

Brendan Cully schrieb:
> 
> On Tuesday, 22 August 2000 at 11:34, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> > Raymond de Vries wrote:
> > >
> > > - kernel 2.4.0-test6 and today's cvs doesn't make the mga.o kernel module. Making
> > > it manually results in:
> > > agpsupport.c: In function `drm_agp_init':
> > > agpsupport.c:312: `VIA_APOLLO_KX133' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > agpsupport.c:312: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > agpsupport.c:312: for each function it appears in.)
> > > agpsupport.c:314: `VIA_APOLLO_KT133' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > make: *** [agpsupport.o] Error 1

The kernel 2.4.0-test7-pre4 has a patch which adds support for kt and kx
via chipsets. The patch I have sent to the dri patch list enables you to
compile everything fine.



> >
> > You must use the latest of the 2.4.0-test kernels (always - there's only
> > one kernel version code).  The latest DRM sync was with
> > 2.4.0-test7-pre4, so you must use at least that.

Comment -> Use the patch I have sent. Otherwise you won't get the
modules

> >
> > If you're using a 2.4.0-test kernel, track Rik's kernel syncs and make
> > sure you update when he does.  Having a single version code means that
> > anything older than the last sync probably won't compile.
> 
> I just #ifdef'd out those two bits in agpsupport.c and it built and
> ran fine on 2.4.0-test6. I don't know if there are some other
> problems, but it appeared to work...
> 
> --
> Don't make Godzilla mad!
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature


Greetings

Michael