From: Keith P. <ke...@ke...> - 2009-07-11 00:47:07
|
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 12:35 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > > + pointer *data; > > Is 'pointer *' actually what you wanted here? Either 'pointer' or plain > old 'void *' should be fine. heh. yeah, pointer would be correct. Note that the updated patch sequence doesn't use a temporary variable for this. -- kei...@in... |