From: Alex D. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-08-26 02:12:06
|
On 8/25/05, Aapo Tahkola <ae...@ra...> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:19:19 +0200 > Roland Scheidegger <rsc...@hi...> wrote: >=20 > > Aapo Tahkola wrote: > > > That check doesnt currently seem to work because some setup(at > > > preinit) with color tiling enabled will get done earlier. > > > > > > Does this version break r200s or radeons? > > From the top of my head, I think it does. For certain 16bit resolution= s, > > that is (as the resolution won't be a multiple of 2048 bits wide, which > > is the block width of those chips for color tiling - i.e. 64 pixels for > > 32bit, 128 pixels for 16bit). That said, I think the use of > > info->MaxSurfaceWidth doesn't make any sense there, it is pure > > coincidence that "2048" is the same (in pixels) for the max width as it > > is (in bits) for the pitch increment. Isn't the block width of the r300 > > based chips 2048 bits too? >=20 > It seems to be. >=20 Should be fixed in cvs. Alex > -- > Aapo Tahkola >=20 > |