From: Dave A. <ai...@li...> - 2005-05-30 11:19:16
|
> > Why is that case invalid? I may have DRM=y so I get DRM on my > PCI graphichs card. Then I might load an agp module in order > to use agp on *some other* agp card. I have no problem with DRM=y,AGP=m being > invalid for the common > single-card setup, but there are multi-card setups too. Not that > I need this special case personally - I have two cards but don't use modules. Yes but the support costs for me of allowing that second case aren't worth it, if people have a special case they don't lose anything by having AGP supported DRM in the kernel or AGP in the kernel all the time.. whereas I don't have to answer a load of questions from people whose AGP cards stop working because they build DRM into the kernel and AGP as a module... Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie Linux kernel - DRI, VAX / pam_smb / ILUG |