From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2005-05-19 17:27:38
|
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On 5/19/05, Vladimir Dergachev <vo...@mi...> wrote: >> On Thu, 19 May 2005, Jerome Glisse wrote: >>> >>> Thus what we may do is use this table or use your swizzle >>> function. Table lookup are faster but we doesn't have to translate >>> code often, no ? >> >> An intermediate approach would be to have an "if" function that is easier >> to read (and debug) but instead of using return values directly populate >> the table with the return values during startup and then use the table. > > Did i said that i already done the table (as a human, at least everythings > tends to make me think that i am a human :-)) Thus making a function > to redo the table may be bit useless :) The function approach might be useful if there are fewer test cases than entries in the table. In this case we win on code maintainability.. best Vladimir Dergachev > > Jerome Glisse > |