From: Dieter <Die...@ha...> - 2004-10-21 21:49:31
|
Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2004 22:51 schrieb Nicolai Haehnle: > Hi, > > There is disagreement about the meaning of the CLIPSPAN _n parameter in > CVS. > > The drivers I have looked at and drivers/dri/common/spantmp.h treat _n as > the number of pixels in the span after clipping. > depthtmp.h and stenciltmp.h treat _n as the end+1 x coordinate of the span. > > This inconsistency leads to artifacts when software fallbacks are hit while > clipping is used, especially with partially obscured clients. The attached > patch should fix these artifacts by changing depthtmp.h and stenciltmp.h > appropriately. What about this? Needed? -Dieter |