Re: X.Org DRI merge

[Alex D. <ale...@gm...>]

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:32:55 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <ai...@li...> wrote:
> 
> also as far as I know the unichrome driver is in-secure it suffers I think
> the same issues as the savage and mach64 with its DDX setting up in-secure
> buffers...
> 
> have a look at
> http://dri.sourceforge.net/IRC-logs/20040628.txt
> 
> if this is so I recommend the via stuff goes in under devel for now ..

The 3d driver should definitly be, but as far as I recall, there is no
DRI enabled DDX component in the DRI tree.  perhaps we should sync up
with the unichrome.sf.net tree?  I thinks that's where most DDX, etc.
devel happens.

Alex

> 
> Dave.
> --
> David Airlie, Software Engineer
> http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie
> pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Dri-devel mailing list
> Dri...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
>