From: Matt S. <ma...@ge...> - 2004-06-14 16:29:29
|
Now that *IS* interesting. I was looking at Cairo for the internals of an SVG renderer, the pluggable backends was what piqued my interest in the first place. Sure.. if there was kernel arbitration for all the features of Cairo needed, accelerated on the graphics card, that would be a cool solution. Portability between X and "Framebuffer" would be possible, along with OpenGL support you'd have everything you'd need. Okay, I'm done here.. I am about to dig into Cairo ;) -- Matt Sealey <ma...@ge...> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Packard [mailto:ke...@ke...] > Sent: 14 June 2004 17:25 > To: ma...@ni... > Cc: Ryan Underwood; Jon Smirl; Alan Cox; Eric Anholt; Alex Deucher; DRI > Devel; xo...@fr...; wi...@ic...; Keith Packard > Subject: Re: [Xorg] DRI merging > > > > Around 10 o'clock on Jun 14, "Matt Sealey" wrote: > > > I half-baked agree with you! I am just looking for an accelerated > > 2D API that isn't permanently in testing and isn't X. > > I'd like to think that cairo fits in this space; it's not X specific and > has acceleratable back-ends for GL and X. > > -keith > > > |