Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48)

[Adam K K. <ad...@vo...>]

> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote:
>=20
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:06:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >=20
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter N=FCtzel wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I sh=
ould do
> > > > > > some testing.
> > > >=20
> > > > No go so far.
> > > >=20
> > > > Modules are somewhat broken in 2.5.48.
> > >=20
> > > One approach is to not use modules, just compile the thing in. Works =
for
> > > me (damn, I'd like to see how the commercial tuxracer looks with bump=
=20
> > > mapping. But apparently DRI doesn't support the right extension or=20
> > > something ;)
> >=20
> > The problem is that it uses EXT_texture_env_dot3 (which the driver does
> > advertise), but the driver doesn't actually implement only implements
> > EXT_texture_env_dot3 or ARB_texture_env_dot3 correctly.  I noted this i=
n an
> > earlier thread about glaxium, but I haven't posted a fix yet.
> >=20
> > I have attached a patch to the DRI CVS trunk that should fix the proble=
m.  I
> > don't have access to an 8500, so I haven't actually tested it.  I would
> > really appreciate it if people with 8500 (or 9000) cards could try this
> > patch and tell me if it works.  If I get a few positive results and no
> > negatives, I'll commit the patch.

I've applied the patch to two machines, one running Linux and one running=
=20
FreeBSD.  I compiled on both machines and installed.  Unfortunately, I=20
won't be able to test the Linux box till I get home, but I'm going to=20
assume that the results are going to be the same :-)

http://memory.visualtech.com/glaxium.png

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like the patch worked :-(

Adam