[Dri-devel] Re: Dri-devel digest, Vol 1 #1735 - 13 msgs

[Jay P. <jph...@au...>]

I'm not sure what you mean by your response.  I'm using the code from
dri.sf.net.  I tried re-applying it after I rebuilt X with the same
results.  I ended up having to re-build X again to fix it.

Jay

> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:32:13 +0400
> From: Konstantin Lepikhov <lak...@pi...>
> To: dri...@li...
> Subject: [Dri-devel] Re: R128 Problems - The information you requested
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Sun 29, 15:53:34 -0700, Linus Torvalds(tor...@tr...) wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On 29 Sep 2002, Jay Phelps wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks to me like DRI claims to be starting up A-OK.  However, glxinfo
> > > reports no and gears FPS is as such that it's certainly not using DRI, 
> > > I'm including my log file for examination.
> > 
> > I had something similar the other week. XFree86.log showed that X had
> > enabled DRI fine, but no acceleration worked. Enabling LIBGL_DEBUG showed
> > that any GLX app was unable to load the r200_dri.so file, even though
> > stracing the binary clearly showed that the open of the file (and mmap)
> > succeeded cleanly. R200_DEBUG showed absolutely nothing.
> > 
> > Doing a "make clean + make World" fixed it for me - there's probably 
> > something wrong with the dependencies in some makefile.
> > 
> > 		Linus
> Hmm...What about binaries from dri.sf.net? Users who using it don't use
> cvs :) Maybe stop prducing "bad" code until source is being fixed? 
> 
> -- 
> WBR, Konstantin
> 
> ZAO ELKATEL Network/Security assistant
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 	...The information is like the bank... (c) EC8OR
> 
>